Alkyl Halide Reactions: Alkene formation using Bulky Bases (E2 Hofmann Product)
Alkyl Halide Reactions: E2 Hofmann (Bulky Bases)
Sterically demanding bases such as tert-butoxide, LDA, DBU, or DBN remove the most accessible β-hydrogen while the leaving group departs, generating the Hofmann alkene. Despite the regioselective switch, the underlying principle is still anti-periplanar geometry: only a β-hydrogen aligned anti to the C–X bond can participate, and cyclic substrates must supply a trans-diaxial pairing. Use this guide to keep bulky-base eliminations predictable—in rings, in hindered chains, and in exam settings where Hofmann vs Zaitsev decisions matter.
Quick Summary
- Class: E2 (bimolecular, concerted) with strong, bulky bases; rate = k[substrate][base].
- Geometry: Anti-periplanar β-hydrogen required; rings must present a trans-diaxial pair.
- Regiochemistry: Hofmann (less substituted) alkene dominates because bulky bases target the most accessible β-hydrogen; conjugation can still trump sterics.
- Substrate order: Tertiary ≳ secondary > primary; primary requires very strong base and heat.
- Solvent/temperature: Polar aprotic solvents or tert-alcohols support basicity; heat favors elimination over substitution.
- Concerted event: No carbocation intermediates or rearrangements—everything happens in one transition state.
Mechanism (3 Steps)
- Step 1 – Anti alignment – Rotate the substrate until a β-hydrogen lines up anti to the C–X bond; in cyclohexanes the leaving group and β-hydrogen must both be axial (trans-diaxial).
- Step 2 – Concerted elimination – The bulky base removes that β-hydrogen while electrons shift to the C=C bond and the leaving group departs simultaneously.
- Step 3 – Alkene outcome – Label the resulting double bond as Hofmann when the anti-accessible hydrogen resides on the less substituted carbon; note the E or Z configuration imposed by the anti trajectory.
Worked Examples
Practical Tips
- Heat plus bulky base is the recipe for Hofmann; mention this whenever differentiating from small-base Zaitsev conditions.
- For cyclohexanes, draw the two chairs and highlight the one with an axial leaving group; mark the axial β-hydrogen to reinforce the trans-diaxial rule.
- Remind students that elimination happens even when SN2 is impossible (e.g., neopentyl); this makes bulky-base E2 a powerful synthetic option.
- Point out safety and handling considerations—DBU/DBN are pungent, and strong bases demand dry apparatus.
Exam-Style Summary
Bulky bases enforce Hofmann selectivity by abstracting the most accessible anti β-hydrogen. Show the conformer with anti alignment, push the three concerted arrows, and label the less substituted alkene (noting any conjugation that overrides sterics).
Keep these pitfalls in mind:
- Elimination stalls without an accessible anti β-hydrogen—expect recovery or competing pathways.
- Upgrade poor leaving groups (e.g., convert chlorides to sulfonates) to keep the reaction moving.
- Conjugation can outweigh Hofmann control if it delivers a markedly more stable alkene.
- Bulky bases are weak nucleophiles, so elimination can still be slow on extremely hindered systems—set expectations accordingly.
Interactive Toolbox
- Mechanism Solver — explore bulky-base presets (t-BuOK, LDA, DBU, DBN) and observe how anti alignment drives Hofmann products.
- Reaction Solver — test how base sterics, temperature, and substrate class influence Hofmann vs Zaitsev outcomes.
- IUPAC Namer — practice naming terminal alkenes and noting any E/Z descriptors.